Dunbar's Number Calculator

Calculate the cognitive limit of stable social relationships based on the neocortex ratio regression.

Neocortex volume / rest of brain volume
Maximum Social Group Size
148
Cognitive limit for maintaining stable social relationships

Social Layers (Dunbar's Circles)

Layer Name Size Description
Interpretation

How to Use the Dunbar's Number Calculator

  1. Select a species preset — choose Human, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, or Macaque to auto-fill the neocortex ratio.
  2. Or enter a custom ratio — the neocortex ratio is the volume of the neocortex divided by the volume of the rest of the brain.
  3. Read the results — the maximum social group size and the breakdown into Dunbar's concentric social layers.

Understanding Dunbar's Number

In 1992, British anthropologist Robin Dunbar published a groundbreaking paper correlating primate brain size with social group size. By plotting the neocortex ratio against observed group sizes across primate species, he derived a regression equation that predicted humans should naturally form groups of approximately 150 individuals. This number has since been validated across diverse contexts — from Neolithic villages to Roman military units to modern corporate departments.

The Regression Equation

Dunbar's Number is calculated using a reduced major axis regression on primate data:

log(N) = 0.093 + 3.389 × log10(neocortex ratio)

The human neocortex ratio of approximately 4.1 produces a predicted group size of about 148, commonly rounded to 150. This represents the number of people with whom you can maintain a genuine social relationship — knowing who they are and how they relate to every other person you know.

The Social Brain Hypothesis

Dunbar's work builds on the social brain hypothesis: the idea that primate brains evolved primarily to handle the computational demands of complex social relationships, not ecological challenges like finding food or avoiding predators. Managing a social relationship requires tracking histories, predicting behavior, and understanding group dynamics — all computationally expensive tasks that scale with group size.

Dunbar's Concentric Circles

Beyond the famous 150 number, Dunbar identified a structured hierarchy of social circles, each approximately three times larger than the previous one. The innermost circle of about 5 people represents your closest friends — those you would call in a crisis. The 15-person sympathy group includes close friends you see regularly. The 50-person band represents your extended social circle, and the 150-person clan is your full active social network.

Evidence Across History

The ~150 number appears across human societies with remarkable consistency. Neolithic farming villages typically contained 150-200 people. The Roman legion was organized into centuries of ~80-100 soldiers. The Hutterite communities deliberately split when they reach 150 members. Gore-Tex (W.L. Gore & Associates) famously limits factory units to ~150 people. Modern military companies worldwide average ~130-150 soldiers. The consistency across cultures and centuries suggests a deep cognitive constraint.

Frequently Asked Questions

Dunbar's Number, approximately 150, represents the cognitive limit on the number of stable social relationships a human can maintain. It is derived from the correlation between primate brain size (neocortex ratio) and observed social group size.
Dunbar identified concentric social circles: about 5 intimate friends (support clique), 15 close friends (sympathy group), 50 good friends (band), and 150 casual friends (clan). Each layer is roughly 3x the previous one. Beyond 150, relationships become more transactional.
Dunbar used a reduced major axis regression on primate data: log(N) = 0.093 + 3.389 * log10(neocortex ratio). The human neocortex ratio is approximately 4.1, which produces a group size of about 150.
Research suggests social media has not increased Dunbar's Number. While people may have hundreds of online "friends," the number of meaningful relationships remains around 150. Studies of Facebook, Twitter, and phone data consistently find active networks clustering around Dunbar's layers.
No, 150 is an approximation. The 95% confidence interval is roughly 100 to 230. The precise number varies by individual, culture, and context. The key insight is the existence of a cognitive constraint on social group size, not the exact number.